[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a36005b50705011139p361dbc46ube0da5e42955f8b0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 11:39:46 -0700
From: "Ulrich Drepper" <drepper@...il.com>
To: "Bill Irwin" <bill.irwin@...cle.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric Dumazet" <dada1@...mosbay.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: per-thread rusage
On 5/1/07, Bill Irwin <bill.irwin@...cle.com> wrote:
> A sort of note for me to refer back to when I get the rest of the way
> here. AIX does this with getrusage(RUSAGE_THREAD,...), Solaris with
> getrusage(RUSAGE_LWP,...),
RUSAGE_LWP is a remnant of Solaris' M-on-N thread library days. No
reason to got there. Use RUSAGE_THREAD. Even though the kernel calls
the process and process group, at userland these are threads and
processes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists