[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070501212750.GC31630@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 22:27:51 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...ena.org.uk>
To: Rafał Bilski <rafalbilski@...eria.pl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Natsemi DP83815 driver spaming
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:52:30PM +0200, Rafał Bilski wrote:
> > * 2) check for sudden death of the NIC:
> > * It seems that a reference set for this chip went out with incorrect info,
> > * and there exist boards that aren't quite right. An unexpected voltage
> > * drop can cause the PHY to get itself in a weird state (basically reset).
> > * NOTE: this only seems to affect revC chips.
> Code commented out and NIC is working OK. Strange.
> eth0: DSPCFG accepted after 0 usec.
> eth0: link up.
> eth0: Setting full-duplex based on negotiated link capability.
> dspcfg = 0x00000000 np->dspcfg = 0x00005060
Oh, that's entertaining. I have to confess that I've never seen an that
triggered the workaround before - adding the maintainer, Tim Hockin, who
may be able to shed some light on the expected behaviour here?
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (308 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists