[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070501222432.GP11166@waste.org>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:24:32 -0500
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix dynticks for voyager
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:38:51AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> As usual voyager tripped over an explicit boot CPU is zero assumption in
> the dynticks code. This is the fix I have queued in the voyager tree.
Can we flush out all these assumptions by adding a constant offset
somewhere? Or reversing the ordering?
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists