[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200705020036.38322.ioe-lkml@rameria.de>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 00:36:36 +0200
From: Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@...eria.de>
To: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>
Cc: "Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>,
"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Thomas Hellstr?m" <thomas@...gstengraphics.com>,
"Jesse Barnes" <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
"Eric Anholt" <eric@...olt.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] DRM TTM Memory Manager patch
On Tuesday 01 May 2007, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > - what's with the /proc interface? Don't add new proc code for
> > non-process related things. This should all go into sysfs
> > somewhere. And yes, I know /proc/dri/ is there today, but don't add
> > new stuff please.
>
> Well we should move all that stuff to sysfs, but we have all the
> infrastructure for publishing this stuff under /proc/dri and adding
> new files doesn't take a major amount, as much as I appreciate sysfs,
> it isn't suitable for this sort of information dump, the whole one
> value per file is quite useless to provide this sort of information
> which is uni-directional for users to send to us for debugging without
> have to install some special tool to join all the values into one
> place.. and I don't think drmfs is the answer either... or maybe it
> is....
Ok, what about debugfs then? If it is just for debugging blobs -> debugfs,
if it is crucial for operation -> sysfs and representation of one value
per file.
Regards
Ingo Oeser
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists