linux-kernel - Re: [2/6] add config option to vmalloc stacks (was: Re: [-mm patch] i386: enable 4k stacks by default)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070501225125.GU26598@holomorphy.com>
Date:	Tue, 1 May 2007 15:51:25 -0700
From:	Bill Irwin <bill.irwin@...cle.com>
To:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	David Chinner <dgc@....com>, Zan Lynx <zlynx@....org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, wli@...omorphy.com
Subject: Re: [2/6] add config option to vmalloc stacks (was: Re: [-mm patch] i386: enable 4k stacks by default)

On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 08:15:11PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> So if you want to invest some time into getting this into mergeable
>> shape I'd suggest you redo the patch series in the following way:
>>  patch 1: dynamic allocated irq stacks

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 05:36:06PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> Can we register them lazily at request_irq time?

These IRQ stacks are per-cpu, not per-IRQ. It may make sense to
implement per-IRQ stacks, in which case dynamic allocation at the time
of request_irq() will make sense.

Would you like me to implement per-IRQ IRQ stacks?


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/