[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4637D459.2040502@rtr.ca>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 19:59:21 -0400
From: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
Cc: ak@...e.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove unnecessary irq disabling
Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> RR asks us if it is really necessary to disable interrupts in
> setup_secondary_APIC_clock(). The answer is no, since setup_APIC_timer()
> starts by saving irq flags, which also disables them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
>
> --- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/apic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/apic.c
> @@ -875,9 +875,7 @@ void __init setup_boot_APIC_clock (void)
>
> void __cpuinit setup_secondary_APIC_clock(void)
> {
> - local_irq_disable(); /* FIXME: Do we need this? --RR */
> setup_APIC_timer(calibration_result);
> - local_irq_enable();
> }
>
> void disable_APIC_timer(void)
Okay, I'll bite: before the patch, this code would exit
with interrupts *enabled*, always. Now it does not.
What does that break, or was it already broken and this fixes it?
Cheers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists