[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4636B7DE.5050005@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:45:34 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
patches@...-64.org, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for
relocatable bzImage
Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> It'd be nicer if there were a "struct boot_params" declaration, but we
> can't have everything.
It's in my patchset-under-development.
(Preview snapshot:
http://userweb.kernel.org/~hpa/setup-snapshot-2007.04.30.patch)
> diff -r 9a673a220ad6 Documentation/lguest/lguest.c
> --- a/Documentation/lguest/lguest.c Mon Apr 30 20:10:26 2007 +1000
> +++ b/Documentation/lguest/lguest.c Tue May 01 13:19:02 2007 +1000
> @@ -30,10 +30,12 @@
> #include <termios.h>
> #include <getopt.h>
> #include <zlib.h>
> +typedef unsigned long long u64;
> typedef uint32_t u32;
> typedef uint16_t u16;
> typedef uint8_t u8;
Why not uint64_t to go along with all the other defines?
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists