[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070501035826.F1D8713CAF@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 05:58:26 +0200 (CEST)
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: jan.kiszka@....de, patches@...-64.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] [28/30] i386: avoid redundant preempt_disable in __unlazy_fpu
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>
There are two callers of __unlazy_fpu, unlazy_fpu and __switch_to, and
none of them appear to require additional preempt_disable/enable here.
Let's open-code save_init_fpu in __unlazy_fpu to save a few ops.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
---
include/asm-i386/i387.h | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: linux/include/asm-i386/i387.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/include/asm-i386/i387.h
+++ linux/include/asm-i386/i387.h
@@ -74,11 +74,12 @@ static inline void __save_init_fpu( stru
task_thread_info(tsk)->status &= ~TS_USEDFPU;
}
-#define __unlazy_fpu( tsk ) do { \
- if (task_thread_info(tsk)->status & TS_USEDFPU) \
- save_init_fpu( tsk ); \
- else \
- tsk->fpu_counter = 0; \
+#define __unlazy_fpu( tsk ) do { \
+ if (task_thread_info(tsk)->status & TS_USEDFPU) { \
+ __save_init_fpu(tsk); \
+ stts(); \
+ } else \
+ tsk->fpu_counter = 0; \
} while (0)
#define __clear_fpu( tsk ) \
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists