[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070501035815.41DAC13CAF@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 05:58:15 +0200 (CEST)
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: joerg.roedel@....com, patches@...-64.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] [17/30] x86: Use RDTSCP for synchronous get_cycles if possible
RDTSCP is already synchronous and doesn't need an explicit CPUID.
This is a little faster and more importantly avoids VMEXITs on Hypervisors.
Original patch from Joerg Roedel, but reworked by AK
Also includes miscompilation fix by Eric Biederman
Cc: "Joerg Roedel" <joerg.roedel@....com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
---
include/asm-i386/tsc.h | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
Index: linux/include/asm-i386/tsc.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/include/asm-i386/tsc.h
+++ linux/include/asm-i386/tsc.h
@@ -38,6 +38,15 @@ static __always_inline cycles_t get_cycl
unsigned eax;
/*
+ * Use RDTSCP if possible; it is guaranteed to be synchronous
+ * and doesn't cause a VMEXIT on Hypervisors
+ */
+ alternative_io(ASM_NOP3, ".byte 0x0f,0x01,0xf9", X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP,
+ "=A" (ret), "0" (0ULL) : "ecx", "memory");
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /*
* Don't do an additional sync on CPUs where we know
* RDTSC is already synchronous:
*/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists