[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200705021158.17759.ak@novell.com>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 11:58:17 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ell.com>
To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
Cc: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove unnecessary irq disabling
> > What does that break, or was it already broken and this fixes it?
> I think neither. This function is only called at early bootup,
> (start_secondary() ), and most of its callees have interrupts off anyway.
> But maybe we do lose something. Andi, do you have a word on this?
We need to enable them somewhere, but cpu_idle will do it in the end.
So it should be safe to drop it. I guess keeping them disabled the whole
time will be a little safer against potential races.
I added the patch, but might want some cooking in -mm first because this
is always fragile code.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists