[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070502100507.GA20142@gnuppy.monkey.org>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 03:05:07 -0700
From: Bill Huey (hui) <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>
To: Ting Yang <tingy@...umass.edu>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
"Bill Huey (hui)" <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v8
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 10:57:14PM -0400, Ting Yang wrote:
> Based on my understanding, adopting something like EEVDF in CFS should
> not be very difficult given their similarities, although I do not have
> any idea on how this impacts the load balancing for SMP. Does this worth
> a try?
>
> Sorry for such a long email :-)
An excellent long email. Thanks.
Have you looked at Con's SD ? What did you think about it analytically
and do you think that these ideas could be incorporated into that
scheduler ?
bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists