[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070502005212.GY2819@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:52:12 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] to something appropriate (was Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans)
* Greg KH (greg@...ah.com) wrote:
> And is this really a problem? The whole goal of the -stable tree was to
> accomidate the users who relied on kernel.org kernels, and wanted
> bugfixes and security updates. It was not for new features or new
> hardware support.
>
> If people feel we should revisit this goal, then that's fine, and I have
> no objection to that. But until then, I think the rules that we have
> had in place for over the past 2 years should still remain in affect.
I have to agree. I went back through my mbox and found vanishingly few
pci_id update patches. So it's not clear there's even a big issue.
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists