[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070502111742.GA18132@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 13:17:42 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, caglar@...dus.org.tr,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>, Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>,
Zach Carter <linux@...hcarter.com>,
buddabrod <buddabrod@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v8
* Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> The problem is with comparing a s64 values with (s64)ULONG_MAX, which
> evaluates to -1. Then we check if exec_delta64 and fair_delta64 are
> greater than (s64)ULONG_MAX (-1), if so we assign (s64)ULONG_MAX to
> the respective values.
ah, indeed ...
> The fix is to compare these values against (s64)LONG_MAX and assign
> (s64)LONG_MAX to exec_delta64 and fair_delta64 if they are greater
> than (s64)LONG_MAX.
>
> Tested on PowerPC, the regression is gone, tasks are load balanced as
> they were in v7.
thanks, applied!
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists