linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET] sysfs: sysfs rework, take #2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070502143808.37dd5ff0@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 May 2007 14:38:08 +0200
From:	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Cc:	gregkh@...e.de, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, oneukum@...e.de,
	rpurdie@...ys.net, stern@...land.harvard.edu, maneesh@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] sysfs: sysfs rework, take #2

On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:39:35 +0900,
Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> wrote:

> All the known regrssions are fixed.  I think I've got all the
> attr->owner but haven't verified with cross compiling yet, just
> allyesconfig on x86-64 and i386.  I'll try to setup some cross compile
> environments tomorrow and follow up if I can find more fallouts.

s390 attr->owner seems to be fine afaics.

I've run some stress tests (attach/detach) on s390 and haven't run into
any problems yet.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/