[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070502150546.GF3531@stusta.de>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 17:05:46 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 01/10] compiler: define __attribute_unused__
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 04:55:50PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> "many ... are marked __attribute__ ((unused))" is not true:
> $ grep -r __attribute_used__ * | wc -l
> 60
> $
Sorry, my fault - I confused used and unused.
>...
> Unused static non-inline functions are the only functions resulting in
> warnings when being unused.
> If we don't want gcc to emit warnings for such, we could disable them
> globally.
But this point still stands:
If we don't want any warnings with CONFIG_PCI=n, CONFIG_SYSFS=n or
CONFIG_PROC_FS=n, we'd have to annotate _many_ functions.
If the lonterm goal is to compile the kernel with -Werror then we need
-Wno-unused-function, not annotating individual functions.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists