lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a36005b50705020946x6cc1cb96r9ddd2b364ba168d7@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 May 2007 09:46:53 -0700
From:	"Ulrich Drepper" <drepper@...il.com>
To:	"Davi Arnaut" <davi@...ent.com.br>
Cc:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Davide Libenzi" <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 14/22] pollfs: pollable futex

On 5/2/07, Davi Arnaut <davi@...ent.com.br> wrote:
> It's quite easy to implement this scheme by write()ing the futexes all
> at once but that would break the one futex per fd association. For
> atomicity: if one of the futexes can't be queued, we would rollback
> (unqueue) the others.
>
> Sounds sane?

I don't know how you use "unqueue" in this context.  If a queued futex
is one which is /locked/ by te call, then yes, this is the semantics
needed.  Atomically locking a number of futexes means that if one of
the set cannot be locked all operations done to lock the others have
to be undone.  It's an all-or-nothing situation.

Locking is not as easy as you might think, though.  For non-PI futexes
there is deliberately no protocol in place describing what "locked"
means.  The locking operation has to be customizable.  This is what
the FUTEX_OP_* stuff is about.

And you wrote that currently each futex needs its own file descriptor.
 So this would have to be changed, too.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ