linux-kernel - Re: [patch 14/22] pollfs: pollable futex

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a36005b50705021053r2fcaf225l956921570dff20e8@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 May 2007 10:53:40 -0700
From:	"Ulrich Drepper" <drepper@...il.com>
To:	"Davide Libenzi" <davidel@...ilserver.org>
Cc:	"Davi Arnaut" <davi@...ent.com.br>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 14/22] pollfs: pollable futex

On 5/2/07, Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org> wrote:
> Is it? Please do tell me more...

Come on, we went through all this.  Having to do syscalls for event
retrieval plus the limited channel available for feedback (the POLL*
bits) is to limiting.  This is where the kevent stuff innovated and
really fixed the problems.  Userlevel ring buffers are more efficient.

Yes, a unifying event look is what is wanted.  But it does not have to
be poll based.  Given the right abstraction you can fit in the kevent
technology or similar things.

And seeing all these requirements of this approach: kevent is also
much more resource efficient.  No "one file desriptor per thread per
object".  These are important factors.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/