linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans: slub

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705021158150.1220@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 May 2007 12:01:21 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, haveblue@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans: slub

On Wed, 2 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> noooo, we don't want competing slab allocators, please.  We should get slub
> working well on all architectures then remove slab completely.  Having to
> maintain both slab.c and slub.c would be awful.

Owww... You throw my roadmap out of the window and may create too 
high expectations of SLUB.

I am the one who has to maintain SLAB and SLUB it seems and I have been 
dealing with the trio SLAB, SLOB and SLUB for awhile now. Its okay and it 
will be much easier once the cleanups are in.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/