linux-kernel - Regression with SLUB on Netperf and Volanomark

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1178131409.23795.160.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 02 May 2007 11:43:29 -0700
From:	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To:	clameter@....com
Cc:	suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, yanmin.zhang@...el.com,
	peter.xihong.wang@...el.com, arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Regression with SLUB on Netperf and Volanomark

Christoph,

We tested SLUB on a 2 socket Clovertown (Core 2 cpu with 2 cores/socket)
and a 2 socket Woodcrest (Core2 cpu with 4 cores/socket).  

We found that for Netperf's TCP streaming tests in a loop back mode, the
TCP streaming performance is about 7% worse when SLUB is enabled on
2.6.21-rc7-mm1 kernel (x86_64).  This test have a lot of sk_buff
allocation/deallocation.

For Volanomark, the performance is 7% worse for Woodcrest and 12% worse
for Clovertown.

Regards,
Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/