[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705021312410.1978@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 13:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans: slub
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> To facilitate this do NOT introduce CONFIG_SLAB until we decide
> that SLUB are default. In this way we can make CONFIG_SLUB be default
> and people will not continue with CONFIG_SLAB because they had it in their
> config already.
We already have CONFIG_SLAB. If you use your existing .config then
you will stay with SLAB.
> The point is make sure that LSUB becomes default for people that does
> an make oldconfig (explicit or implicit).
Hmmmm... We can think about that when we actually want to make SLUB the
default.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists