linux-kernel - Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4638F9BE.8090508@zytor.com>
Date:	Wed, 02 May 2007 13:51:10 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC:	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, patches@...-64.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>,
	virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for
 relocatable bzImage

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> 
> True.  But the plan is already to make bzImage an ELF file, so notes
> would seem to be the best option.  At worst, it could be ELF notes
> wrapped in some other container, but that's not pretty.
> 

It's not going to happen.  Too many boot loaders make assumptions about
ELF files which aren't really compatible; the entry conditions for an
ELF from a boot loader are pretty ill-defined, so I think this is a bad
idea.

At the very least, it shouldn't present the ELF magic number IMNSHO.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/