linux-kernel - Re: [RELEASE] Lguest for 2.6.21

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1178146848.23670.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Thu, 03 May 2007 09:00:48 +1000
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:	lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RELEASE] Lguest for 2.6.21

On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 03:33 +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
> Hi Rusty!
> 
> I found you forgot to check the return value of copy_from_user, and
> here is the fix for drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c.
> 
> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>

Hi Wang!

	Thanks for the patch.  This omission (in several places) was
deliberate.  We can't really do anything sensible if the user unmapped
the page.  I assume you saw a gcc warning from this code?

	We could also use lgread() in these places which does this check and
kills the guest if something goes wrong.  I'll check the benchmarks to
make sure the (slight) extra overhead doesn't cause a regression...

Thanks!
Rusty.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/