[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1178079783.28659.183.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 14:23:02 +1000
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: netfront for review
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 13:51 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 01:37:13PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >
> > > +static int xennet_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int mtu)
> > > +{
> > > + int max = xennet_can_sg(dev) ? 65535 - ETH_HLEN : ETH_DATA_LEN;
> >
> > This seems odd to me: just because a device does TSO should we really
> > allow huge mtu settings? Herbert?
>
> Actually this has nothing to do with TSO/GSO. This driver inherently
> supports arbitrary MTUs that's only limited by our network stack. If
> the physical network device can't handle it you'll just get an ICMP
> error back or fragmentation.
Oops, I misread "xennet_can_sg" as a test for GSO.
Thanks for the clarification,
Rusty.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists