[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200705031107.39609.ak@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 11:07:39 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...o.co.il>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Why ssse3?
On Thursday 03 May 2007 11:02:31 Avi Kivity wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 May 2007 00:56:26 Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> >
> >> Andi Kleen wrote:
> >>
> >>> Nope. SSE3 != SSSE3. The additional S means Supplemential.
> >>>
> >>> It's probably because the few changes didn't justify a SSE4
> >>>
> >> OK, the problem is that the actual sse3 bit is misnamed. According to
> >> Intel's docs bit 0 of ECX is "sse", the kernel uses "pni". Too bad.
> >>
> >
> > PNI (Prescott New Instructions) was the original engineering code name. Unfortunately
> > it was added too early before the marketing name was known and then it couldn't be
> > changed anymore.
> >
>
> Perhaps sse3 could be added as an alias to pni.
That was considered at some point, but it would be a ugly special case and is
probably not worth it. Usually these flags are Greek for most people anyways
(and something else for the Greek speaking people @)
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists