linux-kernel - Re: Execute in place

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 3 May 2007 08:12:38 -0400
From:	Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org>
To:	"Hugh Dickins" <hugh@...itas.com>
Cc:	"Phillip Susi" <psusi@....rr.com>,
	"Linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Execute in place

On Wed 2 May 2007 10:04, Hugh Dickins pondered:
> On Tue, 1 May 2007, Phillip Susi wrote:
> > I seem to remember seeing some patches go by at some point that
> > allowed one of the rom type embeded system filesystems to directly
> > execute binaries out of the original rom memory rather than copying
> > them to ram first, then executing from there.  I was wondering if 
> > rootfs or tmpfs support such execute in place today, or if 
> > binaries executed from there have their code segments duplicated
> > in ram?
>
> Only ext2 supports it today: see Documentation/filesystems/xip.txt
>

Depends on if it is a noMMU or MMU platform.

Since noMMU platforms can't re-arrange non-contiguous blocks (which appears in 
a read/write ext2 file system) we need to use a read only romfs which 
applications are guaranteed to be contiguous by design.

I don't think the noMMU case is documented in xip.txt

-Robin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/