linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] UML - forgot asm-um/cmpxchg.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070503141405.GA5522@c2.user-mode-linux.org>
Date:	Thu, 3 May 2007 10:14:05 -0400
From:	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	uml-devel <user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UML - forgot asm-um/cmpxchg.h

On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 11:09:19PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> OK, I clumped all three patches into one as I think that's required for
> git-bisect friendliness.

OK - I separated the i386 and x86_64 bits to make it easy to drop the
x86_64 part.

Plus, I think it doesn't make any difference - the headers behave the
same as seen from the outside, except that UML needs the uml-cmpxchg
patch in order to build.  So, putting that first, then the other two
separately results in a patchset that builds at all stages, I believe.

				Jeff

-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/