[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C25FB0AF.E59B%keir@xensource.com>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 15:30:55 +0100
From: Keir Fraser <keir@...source.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: netfront for review
On 3/5/07 15:27, "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
>> The function has an effect in page flipping mode only. It walks the
>> whole list of rx skbufs (id is the loop variable ...), checks whenever
>> they are handed out to the frontend driver to fill in packet data and
>> not returned yet, and if so reclaim them ...
>
> Yes, but why use add_id_to_freelist? rx_skbs are not being used on a
> freelist anywhere else. It just means the rx_skb array gets filled with
> small integers, but the rest of the code assumes they're either NULL or
> an skb pointer.
The need for it went away when Herbert Xu made the mapping between
receive-ring slots and receive-request/response identifiers static. I think
there was a race between Gerd writing his patch, Herbert removing the need
for add_id_to_freelist, and Gerd's patch being checked in.
-- Keir
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists