linux-kernel - Re: netfront for review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 03 May 2007 15:30:55 +0100
From:	Keir Fraser <keir@...source.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
CC:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: netfront for review




On 3/5/07 15:27, "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:

>> The function has an effect in page flipping mode only.  It walks the
>> whole list of rx skbufs (id is the loop variable ...), checks whenever
>> they are handed out to the frontend driver to fill in packet data and
>> not returned yet, and if so reclaim them ...
> 
> Yes, but why use add_id_to_freelist?  rx_skbs are not being used on a
> freelist anywhere else.  It just means the rx_skb array gets filled with
> small integers, but the rest of the code assumes they're either NULL or
> an skb pointer.

The need for it went away when Herbert Xu made the mapping between
receive-ring slots and receive-request/response identifiers static. I think
there was a race between Gerd writing his patch, Herbert removing the need
for add_id_to_freelist, and Gerd's patch being checked in.

 -- Keir

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/