linux-kernel - Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070503145318.GA17776@in.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 3 May 2007 20:23:18 +0530
From:	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
To:	Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@...e.fr>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v8

On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 03:29:32PM +0200, Damien Wyart wrote:
> What are your thoughts/plans concerning merging CFS into mainline ? Is
> it a bit premature to get it into 2.6.22 ? I remember Linus was ok to
> change the default scheduler rapidly (the discussion was about sd at
> that time) to get more testing than in -mm.

And what about group scheduling extensions? Do you have plans to work on
it? I was begining to work on a prototype to do group scheduling based
on CFS, basically on the lines of what you and Linus had outlined
earlier:

	http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/18/271
	http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/18/244

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/