| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 10:53:16 -0400 From: simo <idra@...ba.org> To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> Cc: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>, linux-cifs-client@...ts.samba.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [linux-cifs-client] Re: SMB2 file system - should it be a distinct module On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 15:43 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 10:36:53AM -0400, simo wrote: > > I guess DFS referrals can work cross protocol, so if you are redirected > > from a longhorn server to a windoes 2000 or a samba server you want to > > be able to follow the DFS referral and not return an error. > > To do that you need to have either 1 module that support both protocols > > or a way from one module to call the other. Just separating the 2 > > without any glue will not work (or you will have to add some userspace > > upcall hack to make it work). > > You can easily redirect from one filesystem to another through > ->follow_link, and you can mount new filesystems instances from there. > > Can we please stop the bullshitting now? And can you please get a realname > before playing smart ass on filesystem developers lists? I guess you just had a bad day and are in a bad mood, I am have no interest in arguing with you if this is the tone of the discussion. Simo. -- Simo Sorce Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer email: idra@...ba.org http://samba.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists