linux-kernel - Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d9def9db0705031019l5083d1c1h607b0829ab526f1@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 3 May 2007 19:19:40 +0200
From:	"Markus Rechberger" <mrechberger@...il.com>
To:	"Manu Abraham" <abraham.manu@...il.com>
Cc:	"Uwe Bugla" <uwe.bugla@....de>, linux-dvb@...uxtv.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mchehab@...radead.org,
	mkrufky@...uxtv.org, xyzzy@...akeasy.org
Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...)

On 5/3/07, Manu Abraham <abraham.manu@...il.com> wrote:
> Markus Rechberger wrote:
>
> > Manu,
> >
> > to me it looks like your  attitude is not acceptable here, I sent
> > several mails already which you just use to ignore.
>
> You very well know the reason why i am ignoring your mails. You just
> tend to flame people for nothing. I tend to ignore the flamers.
>

You should stop to rely on the history, since such a flame needs at
least 2 parties and back then you were also involved. There's nothing
else to say about that.

> > If you don't change that attitude immediatelly I'd really wish to get
> > you banned of this community until you're open for discussions.
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-dvb%40linuxtv.org/msg22943.html
> >
> > there's a bugreport and you fully ignore it, and you blame it on the
> > "politicians" here, telling me that there are mails out there
> > somewhere shows that you're not interested in getting forward.
> >
>
> That bug report very well proves my point.

Well it would be nice if you could answer the question in that mail
then, I don't see any reason why you shouldn't answer it.

It's just a guess, but it seems like that you had a problem with other
developers at that part and it seems like it didn't get to an end
(probably because both parties didn't agree with each other)

Markus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/