lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705032124020.1479@scrub.home>
Date:	Thu, 3 May 2007 21:41:20 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
cc:	Michael Schmitz <schmitz@...l.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Michael Schmitz <schmitz@...ian.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 04/33] m68k: Atari keyboard and mouse support.

Hi,

On Thu, 3 May 2007, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

> > I explained already at a earlier occasion, why this "generic" keycode
> > thing is broken by design, which makes connecting multiple keyboards with
> > different mappings impossible.
> > 
> 
> No, I don't think so. Your points were:
> 
> 1) You did not want to adjust your legacy keymap on Amiga

Adjusting wouldn't be really a problem, if it had some value...

> 2) You want userspace programs to know how to program scancodes for
> every type of keyboard and have different keymaps for different type
> of keyboards (So you need to have n_kbd_types *
> n_international_mappings keymaps).

I never said that. Many keyboard _types_ need a separate key mapping.
Localization is a completely different problem (and could be solved via 
separate localization tables).
Most of it can be solved in userspace and we wouldn't have to enumerate 
every possible single key the kernel never cares about in <linux/input.h>.

> As far as 2) goes I think it is better to have unified keyboard map
> across different types of keyboards and then overlay
> internatinalization/other settings. And you still have per-keyboard
> configurability as you can change scancode->keycode mapping on a
> per-device basis via evdev ioctl.

You still completely ignore the problem of how said application should 
properly support multiple keyboard mappings...

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ