lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 4 May 2007 00:23:34 +0200
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	Øyvind Vågen Jægtnes <lorrides@...il.com>
Cc:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Routing 600+ vlan's via linux problems (looks like arp problems)

On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 11:12:09PM +0200, Øyvind Vågen Jægtnes wrote:
> On 5/3/07, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de> wrote:
> >
> >On May 3 2007 22:53, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >>> For the rest all we see in the arp cache is (incomplete)
> >>
> >>I suspect that your arp cache is full (128 entries by default).
> >>Check /proc/sys/net/ipv4/neigh/gc_thresh1 (128 for me). You can
> >>set it as high as gc_thresh2 (512 for me), and I don't know what
> >>happens above.
> >
> >Above, you will perhaps need the not-so-elegant userspace arpd :-/
> 
> Yes, i was suspecting that the arp cache got full, but i will try
> increasing it :)
> Would there be any huge bugs if i change these lines in arp.c:
> 
>        .gc_thresh1 =   128,
>        .gc_thresh2 =   512,
> 
> to
> 
>        .gc_thresh1 =   700,
>        .gc_thresh2 =   700,
> 
> under the definition for struct arp_tbl?

I don't think it could cause a problem, but network people will surely
correct me if I'm wrong.

> This setup will only run for about 1-2 hours while we fix the hardware
> router (it is running now, but only on a backup flash card solution.
> the harddrive in it died ;)

Huhhh! Please tell us exactly what make and model of ROUTER you are using
which embeds a HARD DRIVE, so that we recall never to buy that ! Having
seen uptimes of 5 years on moderately big access routers, I would have
find it awful to see them die multiple times in that timeframe because
of a crappy IDE drive inside !

> I have been looking at arpd, but i quickly discarded it as an option
> since its marked both experimental and obsolete ;)

I never dared to try it either, and since 512 has always been enough
for me, anything above is unknown area to me :-)

Regards,
Willy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists