[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705032332500.16661@blonde.wat.veritas.com>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 23:41:15 +0100 (BST)
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans: slub on PowerPC
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
> There are SLUB patches pending (not in rc7-mm2 as far as I can recall)
> that reduce the default page order sizes to head off this issue. The
> defaults were initially too large (and they still default to large
> for testing if Mel's Antifrag work is detected to be active).
Sounds good.
> > - return kmem_cache_alloc(pgtable_cache[PTE_CACHE_NUM],
> > - GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_REPEAT);
> > + return quicklist_alloc(0, GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_REPEAT, NULL);
>
> __GFP_REPEAT is unusual here but this was carried over from the
> kmem_cache_alloc it seems. Hmm... There is some variance on how we do this
> between arches. Should we uniformly set or not set this flag?
Not something to get into in this patch, but it did surprise me too.
I believe __GFP_REPEAT should be avoided, and I don't see justification
for it here (but need to remember not to do a blind virt_to_page on the
result in some places if it might return NULL - which IIRC it actually
can do even if __GFP_REPEAT, when chosen for OOM kill). But I've a
suspicion it got put in there for some good reason I don't know about.
Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists