linux-kernel - Re: [Kernel-discuss] [PATCH 3/8] Universal power supply class (was: battery class)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070503225506.GA20742@zarina>
Date:	Fri, 4 May 2007 02:55:06 +0400
From:	Anton Vorontsov <cbou@...l.ru>
To:	ian <spyro@....com>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-discuss@...dhelds.org
Subject: Re: [Kernel-discuss] [PATCH 3/8] Universal power supply class
	(was: battery class)

On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 11:14:26PM +0100, ian wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 01:31 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> >     # cat /sys/class/power\ supply/ac/type
> >         AC
> > 
> >         # cat /sys/class/power\ supply/usb/type
> >         USB 
> 
> isnt that a bit redundant?

Let me note that "usb"/"ac" is just names pda-power driver
gives for these supplies. So, it's not power supply class issue,
but pda-power.

As for pda-power.. Yes, it can name them "supply0" and "supply1"...
Or maybe "pda-supplyX", but I don't see any need to maim name just
because it is very similar to its type. ;-) Anyhow I don't care
much, i.e. if you or anyone else will insist, I'll change
pda-power's supply names with no problems.

Thanks,

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbou@...l.ru
backup email: ya-cbou@...dex.ru
irc://irc.freenode.org/bd2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/