linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i386: fix suspend/resume with dynamically allocated irq stacks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 02 May 2007 23:01:05 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Bill Irwin <bill.irwin@...cle.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: fix suspend/resume with dynamically allocated irq
 stacks

Bill Irwin wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 06:56:09PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>   
>> This fixes two bugs:
>>  - the stack allocation must be marked __cpuinit, since it gets called
>>    on resume as well.
>>  - presumably the interrupt stack should be freed on unplug if its
>>    going to get reallocated on every plug.
>> [ Only non-vmalloced stacks tested. ]
>> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...source.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/i386/kernel/irq.c |   42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>     
>
> Updated patch follows. Please add your Signed-off-by: if it meets your
> approval;

What does it apply to?  I'm getting conflicts if I replace my patch with
this.  Or does it replace one of your patches?

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/