[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0705040944550.18504@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 09:46:22 +0200 (MEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: Trent Piepho <xyzzy@...akeasy.org>
cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
v4l-dvb maintainer list <v4l-dvb-maintainer@...uxtv.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] [PATCH 35/36] Use menuconfig objects II -
DVB
On May 3 2007 18:40, Trent Piepho wrote:
>
>How about these examples:
>
>menuconfig FOO
>if FOO
>config A
> depends on FOO
>endif
>config B
>if FOO
>config C
> depends on FOO
>endif
This does not work as expected in ncurses-menuconfig either.
It does not even need a "menuconfig" object for that, something
as simple as
config A
config B
config C
depends on A
prints it
A
B
C
rather than
A
\_ C
B
which is why some of my menuconfig patches _move_ C to not come after B.
>How does it show the first one, keeping the config entries in the correct
>order and put them into the menu at the same time?
>
>And which of what should the second be show?
>
>foo
>\-bar
> \-baz
>
>or
>
>foo
>|-bar
>\-baz
>
>There is no question with menus, as the menu tree is clearly lexically
>defined by the matching menu / endmenu pairs. But menuconfig doesn't work
>that way, and it seems like it would make more sense if it did.
>
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists