linux-kernel - Re: c 's OOP in VFS vs c++'s OOP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070504123047.GA2255@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Fri, 4 May 2007 20:30:47 +0800
From:	WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
Cc:	la deng <ladeng.mimi@...il.com>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: c 's OOP in VFS vs c++'s OOP

On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 01:40:04PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
>On May 4 2007 19:00, la deng wrote:
>>
>> What's you think about it?

C gives you the power to control nearly everything. You can, of course, control the registers via inserting assembly code. That's not the fault of C.

>
>I think the discussion should stop right here, because the kernel
>will not be transformed into C++ anytime soon.
>
>
>Jan

OK. Stop here.

Regards!

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/