[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1178282852.11120.282.camel@pmac.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 13:47:32 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>
Cc: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...nedhand.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] jffs2: Add LZO compression support to jffs2
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 14:41 +0200, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
>
> Hmm...everything else in lib/Kconfig is supposed to be _selected_, not
> depended upon. And the only three items in there which can actually be
> selected by the user all begin their helptexts with
>
> "This option is provided for the case where no in-kernel-tree modules
> require FOO functions".
>
> Are you sure it's a good idea to break with existing practice? I'm
> concerned that nobody will ever find the JFFS2_LZO option if it means
> they will have to go all the way down to the "Library functions" menu
> and select something to make the option visible...
That would seem be a tools problem.
Nevertheless, if I merge it with 'select', won't it break while the core
LZO patches aren't yet upstream?
Of course, one could argue that that's also a tools problem. All this
proliferation of 'select' is doing is moving problems around rather than
solving them.
--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists