[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070503183821.b75e8f57.pj@sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 18:38:21 -0700
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mm-commits@...r.kernel.org,
kenchen@...gle.com, agl@...ibm.com, hermes@...son.dropbear.id.au,
wli@...omorphy.com, clameter@....com
Subject: Re: + per-cpuset-hugetlb-accounting-and-administration.patch added
to -mm tree
Adding Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> to the cc list, as he knows
more about hugetlb pages than I do.
This patch strikes me as a bit odd.
Granted, it's solving what could be a touchy problem with a fairly
simple solution, which is usually a Good Thing(tm).
However, the idea that different tasks would see different values for
the following fields in /proc/meminfo:
HugePages_Total: 0
HugePages_Free: 0
strikes me as odd, and risky. I would have thought that usually, all
tasks in the system should see the same values in the files in /proc
(as opposed to the files in particular task subdirectories /proc/<pid>.)
This patch strikes me as a bit of a hack, good for compatibility, but
hiding a booby trap that will bite some user code in the long run.
But I'm not enough of an expert to know what the right tradeoffs are
in this matter.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists