[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070504151934.GA8754@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 11:19:34 -0400
From: lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
To: Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt@...e.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Strange soft lockup detected message (looks like spin_lock bug in pcnet32)
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 04:33:26PM +0200, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 10:10:24AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 04:31:43PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> [...]
> > Should line 2563 be a spin_lock_irqsave instead along with the
> > appropriate unluck later?
> IIRC, when you enable lockdep, it will complain about spinlocks used in
> an invalid context.
What is lockdep and how do I enable it?
I enabled SPINLOCK_DEBUG and am going to try that kernel now (except it
hit the bug before I could even log in and install the kernel this time,
so another reboot first).
--
Len Sorensen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists