linux-kernel - Re: c 's OOP in VFS vs c++'s OOP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 4 May 2007 23:27:52 +0800
From:	WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	la deng <ladeng.mimi@...il.com>
Cc:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: c 's OOP in VFS vs c++'s OOP

On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 09:53:34PM +0800, la deng wrote:
>On 5/4/07, WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
>>On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 01:40:04PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>>
>>>On May 4 2007 19:00, la deng wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>C gives you the power to control nearly everything. You can, of course, 
>>control the registers via inserting assembly code. That's not the fault of 
>>C.
>I think you don't understand me correctly
>
>I know c can inline assmebly to control registers
>
>but,this control not the globe Analysis of control register like
>internal of c++ compiler or lisp 's compiler language,c can't
>
>sigh

You didn't understand me correctly.

I mean that C gives you the power to control them, you can do analysis and then do what you like. It's up to you. But I think if you add optimizing options, the compiler won't be so foolish as what you say.

So, can we stop now?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/