linux-kernel - Re: [patch]clarification of coding style regarding conditional statements with two branches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200705041729.04771.oliver@neukum.org>
Date:	Fri, 4 May 2007 17:29:04 +0200
From:	Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch]clarification of coding style regarding conditional statements with two branches

Am Freitag, 4. Mai 2007 16:48 schrieb Jiri Slaby:
> Why, what's wrong with
> if (condition) {
>         do_this();
>         do_that();
> } else
>         otherwise();
> 
> ? It's more readable/nicer in my eyes than

Than I am afraid we need to agree to disagree. But then I would
insist that neither side give the other a hard to time over this issue.

	Regards
		Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/