lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 4 May 2007 09:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <>
cc:	David Chinner <>,
	Andrew Morton <>,, Mel Gorman <>,
	William Lee Irwin III <>,
	Jens Axboe <>,
	Badari Pulavarty <>,
	Maxim Levitsky <>
Subject: Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3

On Fri, 4 May 2007, Eric W. Biederman wrote:

> Given that small block sizes give us better storage efficiency,
> which means less disk bandwidth used, which means less time
> to get the data off of a slow disk (especially if you can
> put multiple files you want simultaneously in that same space).
> I'm not convinced that large block sizes are a clear disk performance
> advantage, so we should not neglect the small file sizes.

And the 50% gain in the benchmarks means what? That the device 
manufacturers have to redesign their chips?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists