linux-kernel - Re: [patch]clarification of coding style regarding conditional statements with two branches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <463B5E4F.2060900@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 04 May 2007 18:24:47 +0200
From:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To:	Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch]clarification of coding style regarding conditional statements
 with two branches

Oliver Neukum napsal(a):
> Am Freitag, 4. Mai 2007 16:48 schrieb Jiri Slaby:
>> Why, what's wrong with
>> if (condition) {
>>         do_this();
>>         do_that();
>> } else
>>         otherwise();
>>
>> ? It's more readable/nicer in my eyes than
> 
> Than I am afraid we need to agree to disagree. But then I would
> insist that neither side give the other a hard to time over this issue.

Then I would just let it undefined to let subsys maintainers (or coders
themselves) to decide what they want in their subtree like ton of other things...

regards,
-- 
http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/            Jiri Slaby
faculty of informatics, masaryk university, brno, cz
e-mail: jirislaby gmail com, gpg pubkey fingerprint:
B674 9967 0407 CE62 ACC8  22A0 32CC 55C3 39D4 7A7E
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/