[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705032033560.16788@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 20:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Remove constructor from buffer_head
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 3 May 2007 20:08:41 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> wrote:
>
> > Performance tests show a slight improvements in netperf (not a
> > strong case for a performance improvement but removing the
> > constructor has definitely no negative impact so why keep
> > this around?).
> >
> > TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to localhost (127.0.0.1) port 0 AF_INET
> > Recv Send Send
> > Socket Socket Message Elapsed
> > Size Size Size Time Throughput
> > bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
> >
> > Before:
> > 87380 16384 16384 10.01 6026.04
> > 87380 16384 16384 10.01 5992.17
> > 87380 16384 16384 10.01 6071.23
> >
> > After:
> > 87380 16384 16384 10.01 6090.20
> > 87380 16384 16384 10.01 6078.3
> > 87380 16384 16384 10.00 6013.52
>
> How could a filesystem change affect networking performance?
>
> The change looks nice, but I'd microbenchmark it with a write-to-ext2-on-ramdisk
> or something like that.
Hmmmm.. I was told in another thread that this is the most frequently used
slab for this benchmark ...... Just accepted that as true.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists