linux-kernel - RE: Regression with SLUB on Netperf and Volanomark

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1178298897.23795.195.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Fri, 04 May 2007 10:14:57 -0700
From:	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc:	"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
	"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin.zhang@...el.com>,
	"Wang, Peter Xihong" <peter.xihong.wang@...el.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: RE: Regression with SLUB on Netperf and Volanomark

On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 19:42 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Hmmmm... I do not see a regression (up to date slub with all outstanding 
> patches applied). This is without any options enabled (but antifrag 
> patches are present so slub_max_order=4 slub_min_objects=16) Could you 
> post a .config? 

Attached is the config file I've used.  

A side note is that for my tests, I bound the netserver and client to
separate cpu core on different sockets in my tests, to make sure that
the server and client do not share the same cache.  

Tim

View attachment "config-2.6.21-rc7mm2" of type "text/plain" (37472 bytes)