[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <463B815E.8010806@cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 21:54:22 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Phillips <phillips@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/40] mm: kmem_cache_objsize
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 4 May 2007, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
>> Again, slab has no way of actually estimating how many pages you need for a
>> given number of objects. So we end up calculating some upper bound which
>> doesn't belong in mm/slab.c. I am perfectly okay with:
>
> It can give a worst case number and that is what he wants.
Sure. But he can calculate that elsewhere instead of bringing it in
mm/slab.c where it's no use for anyone else...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists