[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <463B81BC.1030504@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 11:55:56 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] Replace paravirt_probe with "platform type" boot
header field
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> You should be able to just include linux/screen_info.h instead of duplicating
> it inline.
>
I'm working on it!!!!!
> I like the use of struct header in the middle of boot_params that
> seems like a nice maintenance device, although I'm not quite certain about
>
> However you haven't documented the old swap_dev field in struct header.
> At least rdev still knows about it, so it is probably inappropriate to
> merge it with syssize. Not that syssize is actually useful for anything
> in a modern system.
Actually, ROM bootloaders care about it, which is why it was expanded
out in boot loader protocol 2.04; see the documentation.
> So I just looked at what /sbin/kexec does so we know what to expect.
> If I have a bzImage I just grab the first setup_sects (i.e. setup.S) and make
> it the initial linux boot parameters, placing the command line immediately
> afterwards.
>
> If I just have a vmlinux so I have to fake it I memset x86_linux_faked_param_header
> to zero, before placing in the values I care about. And the size. 4K aka 1 page.
> Although I due put the command line at 2K, I think that is actually the historical
> kernel usage of the zero page.
Oh flippin' hell. *STABBITY STAB STAB STAB*.
All of which is just evil. So much for "oh, the definition of the
zeropage never changes, so it doesn't matter."
> elilo does something similar but starts with a 16K pages and then backs up
> 2K for the command line.
>
> Gujin does something similar but also seems to place a command line at 2K.
>
> So short of the first 2K we can reasonably expect new parameters to be zero
> initialized. Past that we need to be a little more careful.
Oh flippin' hell.
> And 4K seems to be our maximum size for backwards compatibility. Although
> we use it in a fairly sparse way, so we should be ok.
Sort of. It's pretty full.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists