linux-kernel - Re: [ck] 2.6.21-ck1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200705041959.47686.katana@onetel.com>
Date:	Fri, 4 May 2007 19:59:41 +0100
From:	"David J. Wallace" <katana@...tel.com>
To:	ck@....kolivas.org
Cc:	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ck] 2.6.21-ck1

On Friday 04 May 2007 14:00, Con Kolivas wrote:
> This patchset is designed to improve system responsiveness and
> interactivity. It is configurable to any workload but the default -ck patch
> is aimed at the desktop and -cks is available with more emphasis on
> serverspace.

Hi Con, 

I have 2.6.21-ck1 running happily on a variety of machines. Everything seems 
fine on both uniprocessor and SMP machines. 

I've been running SD for a couple of weeks now, including alternating between 
a SD patched kernel and an "old" staircase based kernel for a week of that. 
SD seems perfectly smooth. In fact on going back to the old kernel for a day 
I'm sure it felt more "choppy". I don't really do benchmarks, "feel" is more 
relevant to me. Right now I'd say my R4 "feels" better with SD than it has 
for a long time. Nice Job. Thanks for persisiting.

As an aside I realized whilst trying non ck kernels the last few weeks just 
how much of a difference swap prefetch actually makes on a lowish memory 
machine such as this.

Arigatou gozaimashita

David

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped