[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <463BA19F.8010500@microgate.com>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 15:11:59 -0600
From: Paul Fulghum <paulkf@...rogate.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty add compat_ioctl
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> - The return value of the new compat_ioctl methods should probably
> 'int', not 'long'. We've had the discussion before and then
> decided not to change the existing compat_ioctl and
> unlocked_ioctl functions -- even though int is more appropriate,
> but having the same prototype has the advantage that a driver
> can use the same function for both ->ioctl and ->compat_ioctl
> if all calls are compatible.
Any comments on this or should I assume that
compat_ioctl() will stay with ulong return type?
--
Paul Fulghum
Microgate Systems, Ltd.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists